<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bureaucratic Babbling about Bilingual Beliefs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://feuerdorn88.edublogs.org/2007/12/04/bureaucratic-babbling-about-bilingual-beliefs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://feuerdorn88.edublogs.org/2007/12/04/bureaucratic-babbling-about-bilingual-beliefs/</link>
	<description>Just another Edublogs.org weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 10:26:54 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jenny</title>
		<link>http://feuerdorn88.edublogs.org/2007/12/04/bureaucratic-babbling-about-bilingual-beliefs/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 08:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feuerdorn88.edublogs.org/2007/12/04/bureaucratic-babbling-about-bilingual-beliefs/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>I liked reading about the candidates&#039; statements and your dissection of them.  I don&#039;t really follow politics, either. I think I&#039;m waiting for an issue that I care about.  My apathy might get in the way.

It seems like many of the candidates weren&#039;t really saying anything.  Typical. 

Since you brought in doublespeak from your linguistics class, I am going to bring in the idea of &quot;othering&quot; that we are talking about as a part of Post-Colonial theory in my capstone class. Much of the discussion of bilingual education relates to fear (either blatant or implied) of &quot;others&quot; and their differences.  Given the choice, many parents would want their kids to be in classrooms with other kids &quot;like them.&quot; This would indeed be familiar and comfortable, but it&#039;s not practical, it&#039;s not welcoming, (and it&#039;s boring).  

This issue was addressed in my high school, and that&#039;s what actually made me think about it.  You used the phrases &quot;foreign language&quot; and &quot;foreign language education,&quot; and so did my high school, until my sophomore year.  The school board changed all &quot;foreign language&quot; speak to &quot;world languages,&quot; in order to eliminate the negative connotations of the word &quot;foreign,&quot; which increases the attitude that people who are different are &quot;others&quot; and that they are not like you.

Besides messing up my transcript, I think this change is an interesting way to think about the treatment of languages other than English in the United States.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked reading about the candidates&#8217; statements and your dissection of them.  I don&#8217;t really follow politics, either. I think I&#8217;m waiting for an issue that I care about.  My apathy might get in the way.</p>
<p>It seems like many of the candidates weren&#8217;t really saying anything.  Typical. </p>
<p>Since you brought in doublespeak from your linguistics class, I am going to bring in the idea of &#8220;othering&#8221; that we are talking about as a part of Post-Colonial theory in my capstone class. Much of the discussion of bilingual education relates to fear (either blatant or implied) of &#8220;others&#8221; and their differences.  Given the choice, many parents would want their kids to be in classrooms with other kids &#8220;like them.&#8221; This would indeed be familiar and comfortable, but it&#8217;s not practical, it&#8217;s not welcoming, (and it&#8217;s boring).  </p>
<p>This issue was addressed in my high school, and that&#8217;s what actually made me think about it.  You used the phrases &#8220;foreign language&#8221; and &#8220;foreign language education,&#8221; and so did my high school, until my sophomore year.  The school board changed all &#8220;foreign language&#8221; speak to &#8220;world languages,&#8221; in order to eliminate the negative connotations of the word &#8220;foreign,&#8221; which increases the attitude that people who are different are &#8220;others&#8221; and that they are not like you.</p>
<p>Besides messing up my transcript, I think this change is an interesting way to think about the treatment of languages other than English in the United States.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
